Mytho/Phaf1 is required to prevent DNA damage and tissue degeneration in Danio rerio

1. Wang H, Wan H, Li X, Liu W, Chen Q, Wang Y, et al. Atg7 is required for acrosome biogenesis during spermatogenesis in mice. Cell Res. 2014;24:852–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.70.

   Google Scholar 

2. Ke L, Lin X, Luo Y, Tao S, Yan C, He Y, et al. Autophagy core protein BECN1 is vital for spermatogenesis and male fertility in mice. Biol Reprod. 2024;110:599–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioad160.

   Google Scholar 

3. Fontana CM, Locatello L, Sabatelli P, Facchinello N, Lidron E, Maradonna F, et al. epg5 knockout leads to the impairment of reproductive success and courtship behaviour in a zebrafish model of autophagy-related diseases. Biomed J. 2022;45:377–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2021.04.002.

   Google Scholar 

4. Liu C, Wu B, Liu W, Li W. Role of autophagy in male and female fertility. Curr Opin Physiol. 2022;30:100611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2022.100611.

   Google Scholar 

5. Kirat D, Alahwany AM, Arisha AH, Abdelkhalek A, Miyasho T. Role of Macroautophagy in Mammalian Male Reproductive Physiology. Cells. 2023;12:1322 https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12091322.

   Google Scholar 

6. Franco-Romero A, Morbidoni V, Milan G, Sartori R, Wulff J, Romanello V, et al. C16ORF70/Mytho promotes healthy ageing in C. elegans and prevents cellular senescence in mammals. J Clin Invest. 2024;e165814. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI165814.

7. Franco-Romero A, Leduc-Gaudet JP, Hussain SN, Gouspillou G, Sandri M. PHAF1/MYTHO is a novel autophagy regulator that controls muscle integrity. Autophagy. 2023;1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2023.2224206.

8. Leduc-Gaudet JP, Franco-Romero A, Cefis M, Moamer A, Broering FE, Milan G, et al. MYTHO is a novel regulator of skeletal muscle autophagy and integrity. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36817-1.

   Google Scholar 

9. Ma Z, Chen J. Premature termination codon-bearing mRNA mediates genetic compensation response. Zebrafish. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2019.1824.

   Google Scholar 

10. Mawed SA, Zhang J, Ren F, He Y, Mei J. atg7 and beclin1 are essential for energy metabolism and survival during the larval-to-juvenile transition stage of zebrafish. Aquac Fish. 2022;7:359–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2021.01.002.

    Google Scholar 

11. Schnörr SJ, Steenbergen PJ, Richardson MK, Champagne DL. Measuring thigmotaxis in larval zebrafish. Behav Brain Res. 2012;228:367–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.12.016.

    Google Scholar 

12. Dalla Barba F, Soardi M, Mouhib L, Risato G, Akyürek EE, Lucon-Xiccato T, et al. Modeling sarcoglycanopathy in Danio rerio. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:12707. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612707.

    Google Scholar 

13. Romanello V. The interplay between mitochondrial morphology and myomitokines in aging sarcopenia. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010091.

    Google Scholar 

14. Rossteuscher S, Schmidt-Posthaus H, Schäfers C, Teigeler M, Segner H. Background pathology of the ovary in a laboratory population of zebrafish Danio rerio. Dis Aquat Organ. 2008;79:169–72. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao01893.

    Google Scholar 

15. Liu C, Khan J, Li W. Assessing autophagy in sertoli cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1748:113–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7698-0_10.

    Google Scholar 

16. Kojima W, Yamano K, Kosako H, Imai K, Kikuchi R, Tanaka K, et al. Mammalian BCAS3 and C16orf70 associate with the phagophore assembly site in response to selective and non-selective autophagy. Autophagy. 2021;17:2011–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2021.1874133.

    Google Scholar 

17. Lee E, Koo Y, Ng A, Wei Y, Luby-Phelps K, Juraszek A, et al. Autophagy is essential for cardiac morphogenesis during vertebrate development. Autophagy. 2014;10:572–87. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.27649.

    Google Scholar 

18. Meneghetti G, Skobo T, Chrisam M, Facchinello N, Fontana CM, Bellesso S, et al. The epg5 knockout zebrafish line: a model to study Vici syndrome. Autophagy. 2019;15:1438–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2019.1586247.

    Google Scholar 

19. Shang Y, Wang H, Jia P, Zhao H, Liu C, Liu W, et al. Autophagy regulates spermatid differentiation via degradation of PDLIM1. Autophagy. 2016;12:1575–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2016.1192750.

    Google Scholar 

20. Huang Q, Liu Y, Zhang S, Yap YT, Li W, Zhang D, et al. Autophagy core protein ATG5 is required for elongating spermatid development, sperm individualization and normal fertility in male mice. Autophagy. 2021;17:1753–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1783822.

    Google Scholar 

21. Fontana CM, Terrin F, Facchinello N, Meneghetti G, Dinarello A, Gambarotto L, et al. Zebrafish ambra1b knockout reveals a novel role for Ambra1 in primordial germ cells survival, sex differentiation and reproduction. Biol Res. 2023;56:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-023-00430-9.

    Google Scholar 

22. Yan Q, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Yuan L. Autophagy: a double-edged sword in male reproduction. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:23 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315273.

    Google Scholar 

23. Wang M, Zeng L, Su P, Ma L, Zhang M, Zhang YZ. Autophagy: a multifaceted player in the fate of sperm. Hum Reprod Update. 2022;28:200–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab043.

    Google Scholar 

24. Wang M, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Chang G, An G, et al. Deciphering the autophagy regulatory network via single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals a requirement for autophagy homeostasis in spermatogenesis. Theranostics. 2021;11:5010–27. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.55645.

    Google Scholar 

25. Sposato AL, Hollins HL, Llewellyn DR, Weber JM, Schrock MN, Farrell JA, et al. Germ cell progression through zebrafish spermatogenesis declines with age. Development. 2024;151:dev204319. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.204319.

    Google Scholar 

26. Karlsson M, Zhang C, Méar L, Zhong W, Digre A, Katona B, et al. A single–cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabh2169. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh2169.

    Google Scholar 

27. Sposato AL, Llewellyn DR, Weber JM, Hollins HL, Schrock MN, Farrell JA, et al. Germ cells do not progress through spermatogenesis in the infertile zebrafish testis. bioRxiv; 2023. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.05.556432v2.

28. Toshimori K. Dynamics of the mammalian sperm head: modifications and maturation events from spermatogenesis to egg activation. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2009;204:5–94.

    Google Scholar 

29. Rengan AK, Agarwal A, van der Linde M, du Plessis SS. An investigation of excess residual cytoplasm in human spermatozoa and its distinction from the cytoplasmic droplet. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-10-92.

    Google Scholar 

30. Schulz RW, de França LR, Lareyre JJ, LeGac F, Chiarini-Garcia H, Nobrega RH, et al. Spermatogenesis in fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;165:390–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.02.013.

    Google Scholar 

31. Jain M, Bhat GP, Vijayraghavan K, Inamdar MS. Rudhira/BCAS3 is a cytoskeletal protein that controls Cdc42 activation and directional cell migration during angiogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318:753–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.01.016.

    Google Scholar 

32. Liu K, Mao X, Pan F, Chen Y, An R. Correlation analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation index with semen parameters and the effect of sperm DFI on outcomes of ART. Sci Rep. 2023;13:2717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28765-z.

    Google Scholar 

33. Spagnoli ST, Murray KN Chapter 43 – Nonexperimentally Induced Neoplastic and Proliferative Lesions in Laboratory Zebrafish. In: Cartner SC, Eisen JS, Farmer SC, Guillemin KJ, Kent ML, Sanders GE, editors. The Zebrafish in Biomedical Research [Internet]. Academic Press; 2020 [cited 2025 Aug 27]. p. 527–46. (American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128124314000439.

34. Amsterdam A, Lai K, Komisarczuk AZ, Becker TS, Bronson RT, Hopkins N, et al. Zebrafish Hagoromo Mutants Up-Regulate fgf8 Postembryonically and Develop Neuroblastoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7:841–50. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0555.

    Google Scholar 

35. Neumann JC, Lillard K, Damoulis V, Amatruda JF. Zebrafish models of germ cell tumor. Methods Cell Biol. 2011;105:3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381320-6.00001-1.

    Google Scholar 

36. Benato F, Skobo T, Gioacchini G, Moro I, Ciccosanti F, Piacentini M, et al. Ambra1 knockdown in zebrafish leads to incomplete development due to severe defects in organogenesis. Autophagy. 2013;9:476–95. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.23278.

    Google Scholar 

37. Gagnon JA, Valen E, Thyme SB, Huang P, Akhmetova L, Pauli A, et al. Efficient mutagenesis by Cas9 protein-mediated oligonucleotide insertion and large-scale assessment of single-guide RNAs. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098186.

    Google Scholar 

38. Bushnell B, Rood J, Singer E. BBMerge – Accurate paired shotgun read merging via overlap. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0185056. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185056.

    Google Scholar 

39. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635.

    Google Scholar 

40. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656.

    Google Scholar 

41. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022.

42. Rau A, Gallopin M, Celeux G, Jaffrézic F. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2146–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt350.

    Google Scholar 

43. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616.

    Google Scholar 

44. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.

    Google Scholar 

45. Johnson NL, Kotz S, Kemp AW. Univariate discrete distributions. 2nd ed.Vol. 17. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1992. p. 240–1.

46. Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy. 2007;3:452–60. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.4451.

    Google Scholar 

47. Tesoriere A, Ghirardo R, Terrin F, Sernesi F, Meneghetti G, Dalla Valle L, et al. Tail Fin Regeneration in Zebrafish: the role of non-canonical crosstalk between STAT3 and vitamin D pathway. Int J Biol Sci. 2025;21:271–84. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.96400.

    Google Scholar 

48. Xu H, Jiang Y, Li S, Xie L, Tao YX, Li Y. Zebrafish Oxr1a knockout reveals its role in regulating antioxidant defenses and aging. Genes. 2020;11:10. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101118.

    Google Scholar 

49. Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book. A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Press, :385. 3rd ed. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press; 1995:385.

50. Kordon MM, Zarębski M, Solarczyk K, Ma H, Pederson T, Dobrucki JW. STRIDE—a fluorescence method for direct, specific in situ detection of individual single- or double-strand DNA breaks in fixed cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:e14. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references